|
Post by Webagent on Apr 10, 2004 15:02:39 GMT -5
I dont think it is a good sign you need a porn movie in a relationship lol, I know it happens all the time.. but why, doesnt your partner have enough effect on you?
tssk tewl, are you not seksy enough to your g/f lol
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 15:14:31 GMT -5
I know Alexander is going to make another Ned Flanders joke, but here goes, lol. To me, porn is just as bd as prostitution. I wouldn't want my girlfriend posing nude for camera men, and the rest of the world. I mean if it isn't immoral as some people has said then why not have s** on the streets in front of young children, and such? It is because it IS immoral to do that. To me s** should be just between a man, and his wife. Not a man, his wife, and the rest of the world. So, why pose naked for the rest of the world to look at? posing nekked isnt like having s**, theres no contact involved, and again... dont use the word morels, everyones morels are different, its a bad thing to say its immorel cause that isnt justified why not pose naked, if you like your body and want to show it off? it doesnt immediatly mean s** men are allowed to walk around topless, you must also be against that too cause its a form of nudity on that note everyone will want to move with the uk because women have voted in their masses to have the same rights as men that if men can walk around top half nekked then they should be able too as well, and due to over 80% of women agreeing to the rights its possibly going to be made law so women can walk around top nekked
|
|
|
Post by Webagent on Apr 10, 2004 15:17:05 GMT -5
why do you call it nekked and not naked?
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 15:18:26 GMT -5
cause it sounds funnier ;D also i been in chat rooms for too long, bad habbit
|
|
|
Post by Webagent on Apr 10, 2004 15:30:53 GMT -5
posing nekked isnt like having s**, theres no contact involved what about porn movies then? hardcore etc?
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 15:32:47 GMT -5
see now movies like that i class as over the top, i count porn as just nude images not raunchy videos
|
|
|
Post by GAME-OVER on Apr 10, 2004 15:43:12 GMT -5
see now movies like that i class as over the top, i count porn as just nude images not raunchy videos Untill the moment cums when you make your own movie with your girlfriend. Will that still be classified as "raunchy" or will it be for you and her for your own private moments. Can be very exciting Alex might wanna try it.
|
|
|
Post by Webagent on Apr 10, 2004 15:43:57 GMT -5
lol @ raunchy, so you would consider that immoral?
|
|
Haze
New Member
^_^
Posts: 630
|
Post by Haze on Apr 10, 2004 15:52:58 GMT -5
and due to over 80% of women agreeing to the rights its possibly going to be made law so women can walk around top nekked Woah, what? Nobody told me
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 15:56:14 GMT -5
lol @ raunchy, so you would consider that immoral? i consider it immorel to buy those kinda videos, not to star in them though yep haze its true, lol
|
|
Haze
New Member
^_^
Posts: 630
|
Post by Haze on Apr 10, 2004 15:58:28 GMT -5
Why buy them when you can download them for free? XD
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 15:59:48 GMT -5
i find posting porn on the net immorel too, cause its too easy for kids to view em
|
|
|
Post by KingpinX on Apr 10, 2004 17:18:18 GMT -5
ummm...... webagent has leather whips n chains in her bed room, RUN!!!!!! j/k web , ya alex its weird american women get fined $$$ "ticket" for going around topless...there has the same things basicly nipples, skin but there'z just bubbled out ;D men should half to wear shirts because all the fat sucks in america plus wouldn't half to worry about looking over seeing a man <3 women lmao
|
|
|
Post by GAME-OVER on Apr 10, 2004 18:07:08 GMT -5
To me, porn is just as bd as prostitution. Whats bad about prostitution? It's a job that needs to be there. It's legal here in Holland and the prostitutes pay taxes like everyone else. Look at the rape numbers if prostitution is not allowed anymore...
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Apr 10, 2004 18:17:41 GMT -5
true but thats not the title of the thread, we had that topic before , lol
|
|