|
|
Post by .•´¯`•þasђγ•._.•´ on Mar 19, 2004 16:52:58 GMT -5
okay this topic is something ohio and i were going to discuss until i said save it for a debate 
global warming.......... crock of sh|t or not ??
give your comments.....
on your marks.....get set.......debate ! ! !
[/i][/color]
|
|
|
|
Post by Fravia on Mar 19, 2004 17:38:37 GMT -5
Not a topic i concern myself with all that often. As it is one of those things thats bound to happen due to our over use of certain things. And in context to all the horrid things that happen in this world everyday compaired to global warming that most likely wont have a major effect in our life time its but a small seed that wont bloom until most of us from this forum are dust & Bones. I would rather concern myself with things that realy directly effect myself & the society i live in. So i leave the worry and nae saying to the guys in white coats with pHD trailing their name. Of course though one might be inclined to the view that what the men of a "pHD" standing see as global warming is meerly nature taking its course from heavy industy, Automotive use ect over the past 100 years or so. A natrual progress that cant be stopped only slowed. I guess in part its a crock of  as you so profainly put it, on the other its not. Depends on how you look at life and its role in yours. Regards, +Fravia |
|
|
|
Post by Chuck on Mar 20, 2004 4:49:50 GMT -5
It directly affects all of us. Anyways, I can't make an informative post at the moment, I'm dealing with something personal these days. However, I'll be back in few days so please keep this topic open for a week  |
|
|
|
Post by .•´¯`•þasђγ•._.•´ on Mar 20, 2004 6:44:02 GMT -5
yes chuck
certainly chuck
3 bags full chuck !
lol 
[/i][/color]
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Mar 20, 2004 9:35:16 GMT -5
how can global warning be a crock of Sh|t as you put it pashy, i mean theres scientific evidence to back it up  |
|
|
|
Post by Dangermouse on Mar 20, 2004 9:45:41 GMT -5
I dont think that was her opinion Alex, just a note on either side of the debate.
And personaly, i have better things to worry about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Mar 20, 2004 9:48:01 GMT -5
lol me too but i like a good debate, it helps put things into perspective and u get to be expressive |
|
|
|
Post by .•´¯`•þasђγ•._.•´ on Mar 20, 2004 10:24:28 GMT -5
yeah mousey is right...it's a debate subject alex... not my oppinion
 [/i][/color]
|
|
|
|
Post by Webagent on Mar 21, 2004 4:13:09 GMT -5
I've read some articles about it and I cant remember why it would be untrue the earth is warming up.. I vaguely remember that if there is more CO2 in the air then plants will grow more and produce more O2 (oxygene) and H2O (water). But if they keep cutting rain forests wich are the lungs of the earth I'm not sure what the result will be.
I think statistics show the sea level is rising because of heating the polar caps are melting, so our country would actually notice pretty quick since half of it is below sealevel.
And besides didnt they make a verry super interesting discovery of a verry verry old human (oldest mummy ever I think) because gletsjers are melting?
Oh and btw, did you know his lungs were totally black inside? it is because those.. how can you call it, cavemen were sitting at their campfire in caves and breathed the smoke.. so smoking excists for aslong as we know lmao.. wouldnt you think if evolution theory was right nature would have done something about lungs beeing vunrable to smoke? (joke lol)
what about our wisdom teeth why didnt evolution caused them to dissapear, its terrible to have these things pulled!
Well maybe evolution theory is a fun subject for next time pashy.. sorry for wandering off the subject lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dangermouse on Mar 21, 2004 6:51:50 GMT -5
"I vaguely remember that if there is more CO2 in the air then plants will grow more and produce more O2 (oxygene) and H2O (water). But if they keep cutting rain forests wich are the lungs of the earth I'm not sure what the result will be."
Yes, plants take in carbon dioxide, and give out oxygen, we breath in oxygen and let out cabon dioxide. When they cut down the trees, not only does that mean less oxygen is produced, all the carbon inside the trees is released.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warrior124 on Mar 21, 2004 6:54:24 GMT -5
Yes. Less oxygen, and more carbon dyoxide. Maybe someday we will all have to hold our breath.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cope on Mar 21, 2004 7:07:12 GMT -5
Well. In the US we have more forests than we had 100 years ago. More so in the lumber producing areas. In the rain forests everyone is wanting to blame logging. Isnt it the people moving to lands that have somewhat fertile land so they can have food that causes it? oh flower no. cant be. Tree huggers can eat my ass. I make it my mission to cut down a tree for each one I hear or see. Along with vegetarians. Eat an extra portion of meat just for them.
this is about global warming. Another story of total rubbish.
|
|
|
|
Post by .•´¯`•þasђγ•._.•´ on Mar 21, 2004 7:48:56 GMT -5
*vomits at the thought of eating copes arse* [/i][/color]
|
|
overdose
XTeam
OverdoseDesigns.net
Posts: 2,804
|
Post by overdose on Mar 21, 2004 8:01:57 GMT -5
Tree huggers are annoying, I bet they go to work and have a desk.. funilly enough made of wood, or have wooden walls in their houses, or wooden fences, or like sitting in front of a fire.
flowering whingers dog about trees being cut down when they use it themselves
|
|
|
|
Post by Dangermouse on Mar 21, 2004 8:18:47 GMT -5
Arent trees being cut down for cattle ranches too?
|
|
as you so profainly put it, on the other its not. Depends on how you look at life and its role in yours.
[/i][/color]
